Friday, 4 November 2016
Introduction of investigation
Introduction of investigation
I chose to investigate names and terms of address after reading Richard Hudson's article on the online English and Media magazine. He describes how every name and term of address has a different social message and I want to discover whether people perceive this to be true. Grice's maxims of conversation link to this argument; Grice's maxim of quality states that we shouldn't portray information for which we have no evidence, does this mean that by calling someone by a title without first asking them what that title is would be flouting a maxim of conversation? I wanted to look deeper into this idea so I chose to investigate the hypothesis 'people's positive face needs are effected when they are being referred to by the wrong title'. To investigate this I used a questionnaire in which I will find out how/when people are offended by being called the wrong title (if at all).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Interesting insight. I'm keen to find out your results. Check affect/effect. How are you going to analyse the longer part of the questionnaire response? I find it odd when I get called Madam but that vocative isn't 'wrong' per se, just not comfortable for me. Have you got any way to capture other vocatives than Mr/Mrs/Miss/Ms/Dr etc? Have you got any way to reach people who genuinely might have an issue to maybe contrast a control group like the neighbours you used with a group that might have non-standard titles?
ReplyDelete